Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
it is often argued that legal requirement is the only way to remind the resident for recycling waste at homes. I partly agree with this statement, and I believe that
a recycle law is not the only measure that the government should take.
In my opinion, a new recycling law is just a possible way to encourage recycling atmosphere. The government could make it a legal obligation for householders to separate all the waste into different rubbish bins. There could be punished as long as someone who fails to follow the rules, ranging from a small fine to community services. These measurements may encourage inhabitants to obey the recycling law. As a result, the improved behaviors of homeowners might lead to a clean and waste-free environment for everyone.
On the other hand, governments should introduce more about recycling law in order to solve the sources in the long term. it could be more effective as long as politicians set education at school rather than establish punishment. For example, pupils could be taught about recycling at school, and homeowners may be informed about the vital impact of handling the waste. Another tactic that governments could be created a stricter regulation for companies that produce the packaging for households’ products. Lastly, expenditure should be involved to improve recycling facilities and systems, so that the processing of waste would be more effective, regardless of whether or not people separate it correctly in the home.
In conclusion, perhaps we need to establish a recycling legal requirement, but it would certainly not be an only way to encourage people to handle their waste more responsibly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.to what extent do you agree with this view? 78
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often argued that legal requirement ...
^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with this statement, and I believe that a recycle law is not the only measure th...
^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... to solve the sources in the long term. it could be more effective as long as poli...
^^
Line 4, column 667, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... would be more effective, regardless of whether or not people separate it correctly in the hom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18148148148 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00084350282 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559259259259 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2370780703 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.615384615 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272767357121 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10096978051 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691370398874 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173779921579 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345913818806 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.