In this day and age, a cashless society has become a debatable issue among people from all walks of life all around the world. Although online payments are regarded as both positive and constructive by many Individuals, there a number of people hold an opposite view. I am inclined to strongly believe that Cashless transactions are good for an efficient society.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support the cashless economy. First and foremost better accountability of money flow. Secondly, avoiding tax evasion and corruption. In my personal opinion when I use such transactions it was very easy to use. Consequently, it quite conspicuous that Cashless payments are good.
However, there is no doubt that a cashless society can provide Individuals with various negative outcomes too. For example information security risks. By way of example, recent research conducted by Oxford University researchers in 2012 has shown that such facilities encourage spending habits.
Thus it is quite obvious that cashless transactions can have negative impacts too.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are some persuasive arguments on both sides, my opinion confirms cashless society is good. Not only due to ease of use but also due to better accountability of money.
- Talk about the pros/ cons of this era as is full of daily inventions 73
- Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 85
- Nowadays, it is increasingly more difficult to maintain the right balance between work and other aspects of one’s life, such as leisure time with family members. How important do you think is this balance? Why do people find it hard to achieve? 71
- Nowadays, it is increasingly more difficult to maintain the right balance between work and other aspects of one’s life, such as leisure time with family members. How important do you think is this balance? Why do people find it hard to achieve? 80
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...iding tax evasion and corruption. In my personal opinion when I use such transactions it was ver...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of example, recent research conducted by Oxford University researchers in 2012 ha...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... facilities encourage spending habits. Thus it is quite obvious that cashless trans...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1207.87684729 90% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2270531401 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93384311318 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647342995169 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1465515182 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2857142857 104.977214359 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143653174375 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438460697187 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302701265344 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706386310117 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309381160628 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.