Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s business world, employees are encouraged to join in the decision-making process, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from working professionals. Most people would agree that it is important to bring employees onboard when making decision as it will directly lead to positive impact to the future direction of the company. This essay will elaborate the benefits in details and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why employees should participate in the decision-making and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that the policy created in this manner could potentially be more rounded and inclusive. This is because there are certain aspects of concern only can be drawn from employees’ perspective where management is likely to overlook. Moreover, when a company involves more minds, different ideas will be brought to light and solutions will be proposed that were never before thought of. Therefore, policies made with employees are generally more robust and sound.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that involving employees in the decision making process would encourage innovation and stimulate creativity among the peers. A recent research published on Economist indicates that when company employees are given the opportunities to express themselves, the organization itself usually will reap the most benefit from the surge of different views and innovative ideas, which could potentially translate to excellent policies to better shaping the company in multiple dimensions.
In conclusion, it is agreed that employees are important asset to company, with their minds put in gear for the decision making, they will get the recognition they rightfully deserve while at the same time, the policies created can be both beneficial and productive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | sara malla | 77 | view |
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Sceptical claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produ 80
- Governments promise continues economic growths, but its actually an illusion. SOme people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications. 85
- Employees should be treated with respect to their age, please elaborate this. 77
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Gove your response with justification. 88
- Elder people are more efficient in working environment than younger people, discuss. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'will' and 'reap'.
Suggestion: will usually reap
...ess themselves, the organization itself usually will reap the most benefit from the surge of diff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
...the recognition they rightfully deserve while at the same time, the policies created ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58947368421 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01119282689 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9948716263 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.3 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2015931199 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817708439333 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601229983325 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128563737106 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283248873195 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.