Some people think that advertising on TV is useful for viewers, while others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, television is being considered as a pivotal media for advertisements throughout the world. Most importantly, it has been a bone of contention among the spectators and experts regarding its usefulness. While some people consider publishing adverts with the broadcasting agencies are beneficial for the audiences, I would contend that there is a sheer chance of being confused with the offered selling points as well as it spoils tons of productive hours.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that new products and services can be reached to a maximum level of customers using this telecasting media that helps to meet the specific needs of anyone from the buyers' panel. Therefore, we can get updates of a new launch of tangible and intangible items within the shortest possible time. Thus, the consumers who are exposed to those TV commercials, as a potential client pool, can take a wise buying decision based on the features and benefits explained in that 30-seconds time frame. In most cases, these promotional media is backed by the creative and innovative approach of presenting recommendations or proof for a certain product. An empirical survey conducted in the USA by the Business Insider Group ascertained that 65-75% of the buying decision of the consumers now comes from the advertisement viewed on television and a sheer proportion of those audiences are satisfied as their need was fulfilled.
Conversely, some experts on human psychology along with a group of viewers explained that multifarious adverts actually make them confused about what products or services are to be pursued. This happens when a variety of promotional campaign goes on air for a similar kind of products. Additionally, the viewers also claim that the majority of the TV programs are financially supported by several slots of commercial breaks. Therefore, a fifteen-minutes episode of a favourite sitcom may be spoiled by additional fifteen-minutes time-killing advertisements. This can be illustrated by the 15% upward trajectory of customers in Australia who spent for a premium package from the cable operators to get rid of those unwanted adverts.
To recapitulate, television is undoubtedly a fast-accessible media for promoting business interests. But considering the aggression of the competitive commercial world, to me, this is the place where we might get easily confused or wrongly biased and end up with wrong buying decisions.
- You had a good meal at a local restaurant with your family. Write a letter to the newspaper to tell them about it, describe the meal you had, and why you think the restaurant is worth visiting. 81
- Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 78
- Online, people write opinions and reviews of services. Is it a good thing or bad thing.? 56
- You borrowed an important textbook from a classmate last term. You now realize your classmate had returned home overseas and you still have the book. Write a letter to to him / her. In your letter:•apologize for the mistake•find out how important the 78
- Essay topics: You have a problem with a neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letter1. Describe the problem2. Say how long it has been a problem3. Explain what action you want the neighbour to take 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33074935401 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19852597436 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586563307494 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8774741633 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.533333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08861561823 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027837585816 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297899046147 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538371795639 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332796053789 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.