Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments, or even criticism their teachers. Other think it will lead to loss of respect and displine in the classroom. Discuss both views and give

Education is a never-ending learning process that had always been a significant part of our lives. It is a single and vital way to success as well as personal growth. As education is a building block in our lives, we are willing to invest more in our education. By improving our own knowledge, high school students are encouraged to speak their own minds. However, others think that it will cause them to become disrespectful and indiscipline in school.

First and foremost, before making any comments, students shall mind their own responsibility. Students' responsibility, namely, study hard, pay full attention during a lesson and also done their schoolwork on time. However, nowadays students do not behave appropriately, their disobedience and mischievousness lead to many problems. Still, they blame their teachers do not teach in either proper or understanding way.

On the other hand, headquarter shall erect a feedback box in the admission office. Eventually, have a meeting with teachers after collected students' feedback. Therefore, they could discuss the solution to the problems and avoid doing it again. In addition, the school shall provide a thrice a month mandatory education training for teachers. By training, teachers not only improve themselves but also learn more about the skills of educating and communicating with students.

To sum up, even though there are good reasons to make arrangements but in opinion, I would pen down by saying that if there is a misunderstanding between teacher and student, they shall directly have some discussion.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in either proper or understanding way. On the other hand, headquarter shall ere...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...a meeting with teachers after collected students feedback. Therefore, they could discuss...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35080645161 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10717078317 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66935483871 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3340453001 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236587047872 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688696722231 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490679652548 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119770758438 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395948652107 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.