the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008
The bar charts compare the proportion of males and females marriage age group in the 1996 and 2008, is measured in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the 16-19 age group in 2008 decreased significantly compare in 1996. Overall, the proportion of younger age groups that got married decreased significantly, while older age groups increased. Moreover, the percentage of male and female aged 16-19 occupied the lowest quantity of marriage
To begin,the 16-19 age group of females in 2008 declined dramatically to about 1% compared with 2009, but conversely no male got married in 1996 and 2008. Next, there was a sharp fall in both genders of 20-24 age group over a ten year period.
With respect to concerning to the older age groups, the its unlike both genders when getting married in the 35-39 and 40-44 increased gradually during 2008(there were also significant increases in the 35-39 and 40-44 demographics, with the percentages climbing from 7 to 9 and 5 to 7, respectively
. 35-39 was the marriage age by menThe most typical age for a man to marry was
rather than women, at over 4% and over 2% in 2008. Again, the proportion of married men more than the percentage of women to about 3 three times. Is not true
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 47 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
- age when getting married by the group 67
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 56
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant. 78
- arrests per year for using illegal drugs from 1991 to 2005 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... lowest quantity of marriage To begin,the 16-19 age group of females in 2008 decl...
^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
... to concerning to the older age groups, the its unlike both genders when getting marrie...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ng from 7 to 9 and 5 to 7, respectively . 35-39 was the marriage age by menThe mo...
^^
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...men to about 3 three times. Is not true
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, moreover, so, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80660377358 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72029977357 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.9575229698 43.030603864 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.222222222 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25031064437 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105948312681 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630586446529 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133922700782 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606016583654 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.