Many people believe that it’s better to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed by a large number of people that team learning is a more effective way of learning in comparison to individual learning. Although learning independently has some benefits for learners, I believe that the advantages of learning with other people is far outweigh it.
On the one hand, some people prefer to study and learn without collaborating with other people weather they are at home or in a class. As individual education is based on learners’ ability in learning educational contents, it would be possible for them to follow the learning process based on their own level or pace. Another reason is that, when people are educated alone, they will have a chance to be centre of their teacher attention and ask their questions without any limitation. That is why learning individually can be a convenient and practical way for some people in order to be educated and taught.
On the other hand, although individual education is a beneficial learning method, in my opinion studying with a group of other people bring considerable advantages for learners. First of all, not only does team learning improve people’s knowledge around learning subjects, but it also develop vital characteristic traits in each individual. As people are given a chance to collaborate on their knowledge, they will learn how to gain team-work abilities so that they can share their knowledge and information with each other. Therefore, if people choose a team learning process, they will become incredibly generous and devoted due to the effective coordination between the team members. Another opportunity that is provided for group learners is that, they are exposed to a wide range of invaluable tips and knowledge by other members of the group which could not be accessible if they were not in a team.
In conclusion, I completely agree that learning in a team is highly advantageous to all the people in the team because of its personal and educational improvement.
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people associate money with happiness and think that the more money one has the happier they should be Do you agree with this statement Give relevant examples from your own experience 79
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people believe that it’s better to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that the government should take care of old people and provide financial support after they retire. Others say individuals should save during their working years to fund their own retirement. What is your opinion? Give reasons for your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
It is believed by a large number of people that team learning is a more eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to improve'
Suggestion: to improve
...rst of all, not only does team learning improve people's knowledge around learning...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'develops'?
Suggestion: develops
...e around learning subjects, but it also develop vital characteristic traits in each ind...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12345679012 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97619857599 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.5891687156 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186498930281 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886919951654 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378738608722 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135026122039 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342102045467 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.