Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places
Laws means some regulations that are required to conduct the state systematically. The main purpose of the laws is to establish the justice so that everyone in the country can have their rights and get chance to lead their lives legally. So, strict imposition of laws is very important for the development of the country. That’s why, I mostly disagree with the statement that laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times and places.
First of all, the development of a country is dependent on whether the denizens of the country are getting equal rights or not. If laws become flexible, one portion of the population will use the flexibility for their own sake and the other portion will be deprived. Consequently, the main purpose of the laws will be failed and the peace of the society will be perturbed. For example, in Bangladesh, the members of the ruling party use the power of the administration for their own sake and earn money illegally. They possess lands of the public illegally who are unable to protest and force them so that public can’t file a case against them. However, this is the situation in Bangladesh where administrative power is nothing but the helping hand of the leaders. If laws become flexible in countries like Bangladesh there will be no way for the citizens to escape the tyranny. This phenomenon indicates the necessity of strict imposition of laws.
Secondly, if laws become flexible, people will lose the trust and respect to the legal system of the country which will be responsible for increasing crimes and corruptions in the society. For example, in Russia, since legal system is weak and the police forces are not sincere is unable to provide good protection to the businesses and security to the citizens. As a result, it causes a enervated economy. Once again, it becomes lucid that laws should not be flexible rather it should be strict.
Finally, it is true that the legal system is changing worldwide to keep pace with the changing political, economical and social system. But, it has to be done in a way so that the rights of the people can be distributed equally without any discrimination. Furthermore, the amendment of laws should be done in a lawful way. For example, in democratic countries at least two third of the members of the parliament required to give their support to amendment any law.
In summary, from the above analysis and examples it is completely unambiguous that laws should not be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Alinasr26 | 83 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 58
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 58
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to the citizens. As a result, it causes a enervated economy. Once again, it becom...
^
Line 10, column 307, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a lawful way" with adverb for "lawful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e, the amendment of laws should be done in a lawful way. For example, in democratic countries a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, as to, at least, for example, in summary, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95632183908 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81896264661 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485057471264 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7471597946 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04761904762 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353606479087 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111271715795 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160068474624 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260484942703 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16980967359 0.0667264976115 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.