The chart below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010 with projected sales for 2020
The bar chart illustrate the quantity of magazines sold in 2000 and 2010 and give some prediction in the magazine market by 2020.
Overall there were marginal upward trends for all three countries A, B and C while this figure for country D saw a steady improvement. Another interesting point is that the quantity of magazine sales in country E varied over the period given.
Looking at details, in 2000, average magazine sales in two countries A and B are the same at 50 but this figures went down by around 4% in the next decade and they are forecasted to continue to reduce at 38% and 45% respectively. Similarly, country C experienced the same trend. Starting at nearly 38%, this figure for country C fell to 36% in 2010 and will hit a trough at 32% by 2020.
By contrast, the consumption of magazine per person in country D witnessed a gentle grew after a decade from 18% in 2000 to 20%. This figure is anticipated to be improved, finishing the period at 23%. On the other hand, despite reached the peak at 7% in 2010 the number of magazine sold in country E still remained at the bottom since the beginning. Furthermore, this figure is forecasted to return the initial point at 5% by 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-24 | TranMinhDuc | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | hin07 | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | tda | 71 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town and the UK as a whole in 2008 80
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2007. 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 62
- the percentage of different types of waste recycled 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, look, similarly, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53917050691 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64683066833 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3472280076 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293792464264 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119845966681 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750807603388 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197557456079 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506444847566 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.