Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected personal relationships? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Due to the advancement in the field of technology the method of communication between human being has altered. This essay will discuss how technology influenced the bond of people over a few decades and elaborate on why this development has a negative impact on people life.
These digital eras allow people to get interact with so many friends via chatting and social networking which creates a healthy relationship between human. Apart from this, we need not visit a relative or friend to get updates. In the early days, there was a very limited way of building relationships but technology has brought the greatest impact in today's world. Moreover, we can make friends beyond boundaries and getting in touch with childhood friends. People travel to work from one place to another part of the world but they can Easily be linked with their loved one which makes possible because of technology. Incite one example, I had a friend name Rohit and still connected with me through the internet even he is not near to me and we build a good sound relation by chatting, video calls and emails.
On the other hand, people now can deceive others using fraud identify which lead to creating detrimental effects in human life. As well as using technology are high cost and each person needs to spend a large amount of money. Importantly elder people are not accustomed to this modern technology and they found access to such are a harder and difficult job. They believe communication done by face-to-face is far better than any other. A survey conducted by a mass of pupil found that nothing is better than physical communication as it is the best way of interaction and to share emotions and feelings.
To recapitulate, technology has brought significant changes in the way of communication at some point it has been a positive impact but cybercrime such as fraud has grown rapidly and people are spending large money using the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-31 | Suman Giri | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- In many countries people are living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short time and thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to 64
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected personal relationships? Has this become a positive or negative development? 89
Comments
Beg your pardon sir, I didn't
Beg your pardon sir, I didn't get the meaning of WHITE SPACE will you please elaborate me, sir,
You may ignore ’WHITE SPACE‘.
You may ignore ’WHITE SPACE‘. It is not serious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion and to share emotions and feelings. To recapitulate, technology has brought ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, well, apart from, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89969604863 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71340571241 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601823708207 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1646386391 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.142857143 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29369027671 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831615722226 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472843711726 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157963337861 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00786072736463 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.