College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author adduces that the benchmark for the selection of the field of study by students should be the existence of future occupation on that field. This is the claim with which I partially do not concur. Among the countless rearing reason, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to give adherence to my standpoint.
First of all, there should be a well-defined term for the definition of the study purpose. Actually, various factors can be listed as the aim of study; while some people consider education as the path for exploring the novelty and mysterious of world, some others emphasize the study as flourishment of themselves; or there are some group which brings up the study as a tool for achieving a great and well-paid job in the future. According to this various list of study goals, absolutely there should be the difference of field selected by the students. However, since the main feature of mankind is his chasm and endless eager for thriving in any realm, this could be bolded as one of the main causes of study. In addition, the easiest way for flourishment is by doing an affair which aligned with the individual’s desire. In this case, there is the possibility of no match between the selected field of study, which looks for the availability of a job, and student desire. Consequently, the ratio of his prospering will be low.
Another striking reason which should be considered is the individual’s talent in that specific field of study. Even the main aim of the study by a pupal is mentioned as finding a good job, there is no guarantee that his all efforts on that particular field of study will end to the high-salary occupation. The one factor which makes the occurrence of this event to be shaky is students’ talents. Indeed, it is obvious that the talent over a subject owns a magnificent role in the success and feat of a person on that subject. A lucid example which depicts the importance of talent is the instance of Newton. Newton explored the gravity force merely by the hit of a falling apple, which had founded by no person hit by apple till that moment. This example explicitly illustrates the effect of talent, if a person possesses a specific talent, his chance of achieving the success is high. Therefore, by studying the trend field of study to warrantee the future job is not feasible till there will be talent about the field.
However, what is discussed above should not be overgeneralized; the high cost of education, and scanty of loan for financial support of education, force the family and students to spend lots of money. Thus, there is the expectation of earning high in the future to fulfill the current expenses; in this scenario, seeking the trend job is a wise option. According to the noteworthy intelligence survey conducted in Iran, each family in Iran spends two hundred million toman for their child’s education before his entrance to the university, which this amount is equal to hundred-fold of monthly salary of medium-income job in Iran. Therefore, there should be a return of all these expenses in the future.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons explicitly depict while the expense of studying should not be underestimated, the importance of talent and desire of the student on his future job are two main factors which completely guarantees students triumph.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-25 | christine_cui | 54 | view |
2019-10-25 | nikkk | 50 | view |
2019-10-14 | Saudamini Ghatge | 54 | view |
2019-10-08 | Deepali24 | 50 | view |
2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 58 | view |
- tpo37-integrated 3
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 69
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 62
- tpo28 60
- tpo 11 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...shment of themselves; or there are some group which brings up the study as a tool fo...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roup which brings up the study as a tool for achieving a great and well-paid job ...
^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...tudy. Even the main aim of the study by a pupal is mentioned as finding a good job, the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2818.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 577.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88388214905 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90110439584 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87784955964 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466204506066 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9044432982 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.52173913 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0869565217 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268852282991 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879121603298 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625544293682 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164088562416 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309811176331 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.