Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Do you think it is a positive or negative development.
Nowadays, the boom in a significant increase regarding the number of shopping malls that leads to the gradual disappearance of small stores. For my perspective, this change brings both negative and positive impacts, however, the positive is greater.
On the one hand, this tendency may give consumers a range of benefits which small stores could not give. First of all, shopping malls help people to save time when they plan to go shopping. To more detail, shopping malls which are available many kinds of different stores, for instance, food, clothes, accessories books, and even entertainment facilitates. Therefore, if a family would buy many types of thing, they just need to go to a shopping mall, they do not have to move from store to other stores which is quite time-consuming and inconvenient. As a result, this is the reason why currently shopping mall is more favorable than conventional stores.
On the other hand, there are still many different advantages of shopping mall bringing to people. For example, this is obvious that shopping malls have many promotions and discounts for consumers compared to small stores. Moreover, shopping malls also provide their customers with a range of facilities such as free parking cars, memberships, and free delivery. Future more, a shopping mall could create huge opportunity employment for local people from that give the government a hand in reducing the unemployment rate and improving local live standards.
In conclusion, although many people argued that shopping malls could bring some drawbacks such compete to local small stores but I intensely believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | kartikpassi | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | Razeenaj | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Vikky | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | shohruh.fayzulloyev | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Kuwinder singh | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 49
- not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. why? how to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 78
- some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today\s life. others argue that the history is a valua source of information. do you agree or disagree? 56
- some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today's life. others argue that t history is a valuable source of information. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vailable many kinds of different stores, for instance, food, clothes, accessories...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s. On the other hand, there are still many different advantages of shopping mall bringing to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30681818182 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85753468511 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2307985587 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225714325714 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921122074754 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276411558425 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150092485679 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337292155838 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.