Although it is generally prohibited, corporal punishment persists in many families. Do you think corporal punishment is an acceptable way to regulate children’s bahaviours?
People have different opinions on the role of physical punishment in raising children in families. While some people think that this is a good way for parents to enforce discipline on their children, I believe that such a practice can leave many adverse implications on the development of the children and parents could consider other different methods to teach them effectively.
Although corporal punishment can provide effectiveness on forcing children to behave in a certain way, not only can such a method have negative impacts on their childhood, but also can leave long-lasting effects. In terms of physical health, there are cases where children have beaten so severely by their guardians that they need medical attention. It is can be said that the likelihood of children not keeping up with their study schedule is high since these physical injuries may discourage them from concentrating on their homework. From the perspective of mental development, the use of physical punishment may exert detrimental effects on youngsters’ psychological health, especially during their formative years. This could push children into suffering serious mental illnesses such as anxiety and depression, while make others probably have a tendency to be more violent and aggressive, driving them to become bullies or delinquents.
Instead of setting this harmful method, there are several safer and more productive options for teaching children. Firstly, it is essential that parents need to develop an open and honest line of communication with their children. This can be done by spending more time playing with their children or helping them to do their tasks. These would offer parents more opportunities to understand their children’s thought and feeling, encouraging children to express their emotions and shape personalities. Secondly, by establishing a few rules that children can understand, parents would gradually teach them how to be more self-disciplined and responsible. For example, if one of the rules has been broken, children will not have been allowed to play with their toys for the rest of the day.
In conclusion, although corporal punishment may bring instant obedience from youngsters in their family, I believe that this practice should be ended due to its drawbacks. Other alternatives would be greater educational values to change a child’s behaviour.
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree/disagree? 84
- In some cultures the old age is highly valued while in some cultures youth is highly valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 95
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can such a method have negative impacts on their childhood, but also can leave l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49322493225 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0611120678 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563685636856 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8099089622 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.133333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170315991553 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640533035446 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457566164731 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11699061756 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259212969131 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.