TPO6
The passage compares communal online encyclopedias with traditional ones and mentions three main problems of the online versions. However, the lecturer asserts that the issues illustrated in the passage are based on prejudice, and the writer doesn't know how far the online encyclopedias have come.
First, the passage points out that since anyone can edit contents of an online encyclopedia, it is highly probable that inaccurate information appears on them. On the other hand, the lecturer alleges that none of the traditional encyclopedias have been perfect so far. Also, it is a significant advantage of online ones that errors are easy to correct in comparison to mistakes that remain in the printed encyclopedias for a long time.
Second, the writer refers to the problems which hackers might create on online encyclopedias since the contents are accessible to them. On the contrary, the professor explains that most online encyclopedias do their best to protect essential materials. For example, they offer crucial information only in read-only format. Moreover, there are always some expert editors that monitor the new materials to prevent malicious corruptions.
The final point that the author mentions is that the relative importance of different articles is not noticeable in online encyclopedias because there are immense reading contents corresponding to any topic, whether it is a significant one or not. Conversely, the lecturer states that this is one of the benefits of online encyclopedias that the space is not limited. She claims that in the case of traditional encyclopedias, a group of academic people never could select the topics which appeal to all people. Instead, online versions now provide a great diversity of subjects in various majors, and it is the most substantial advantage of online encyclopedias.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... are based on prejudice, and the writer doesnt know how far the online encyclopedias h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, as for, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43205574913 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02822939104 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.581279387 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.8541721854 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.