Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In today’s developing world, land is a very important resource for the development of a country. The wilderness has to be destroyed to get more land and thousands of acres of jungles, forests are being cut down to acquire land for further developmental projects. Conservation of the wilderness is a major concern and nations need to pass laws in order to preserve them. The following are the reasons why conservation of wilderness should be a major concern.
Firstly, wilderness is an integral part of the ecosystem. It provides us with many resources which are very valuable and cannot be replicated artificially. For instance, we get oxygen, gum, fruits and many other useful resources from the forest. Also, wilderness helps in preventing floods as the excess water is absorbed by which is not the case if we have “concrete jungles”. Additionally, it is a natural habitat of the wild animals. If the wild animals do not have a natural place to live, they will come to the cities in search of food which would pose an immediate danger to humans. Hence, destroying the wilderness would result in some serious threats to man kind.
Many people may argue that the land could be used for better purposes that would improve the economy of the nation and help in its development. For example, if we use the land to set up factories or commercial buildings, we will generate a lot of employment, many people will settle around such areas for work which would further lead to improvement in terms of public facilities such as transport, tele-communication etc. If these laws are implemented then, the growth of the economy would be a bit slower.
However, the laws that would be passed in order to preserve the wilderness at the cost of development would benefit man-kind in the long run. For instance, there would be cleaner air, lesser floods, more of forest resources and vegetation. Development cannot come at the cost of destroying our natural resources. The places where the wilderness was destroyed for development are facing serious issues. For example, Bejing’s air pollution. There are not enough trees to clean the polluted air and thousands of people are suffering from respiratory diseases due to the same reason. Hence, in order to prevent such incidents, nations should pass laws to preserve the natural wilderness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- loyalty can be as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one 50
- dsasd 16
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 82
- In the last year’s mayoral election in Town T, candidate Miller led candidate Keating by a substantial margin in the polls leading up to the election. At the last minute, candidate Keating launched a widely viewed series of television advertisements tha 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, then, as for, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0616966581 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95807703273 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514138817481 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7379983587 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7619047619 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5238095238 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255010369828 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780420920815 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401997871074 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160615204514 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471132157937 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.