The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides information about the proportion of tourists who visited aquariums, castles, zoos, and festivals in Edinburgh, Scotland from 1980 to 2010.
It is clear that the trend of tourists to castles and zoos increased slightly over the period, while the other two places are aquarium and the festival had a lower percentage of visitors.
In 1980, the number of tourists to castles initiated nearly 25%, while the percentage of tourists to the zoo was 10%. From 1980 to 200, the proportion of visitors to the castle rose dramatically to reach a peak of approximately 45% in 1995 and declined slightly to about 35% in 2000. After 2000, the percentage of tourists to Castle continued to go down gradually, the tourists to the zoo grew to 20% at the end of the period.
The percentage of visitors to the festival was 30%, the highest percentage in 1980, while the proportion of visitors to the aquarium was almost 20% in the same year. There was an impressive increase in the proportion of tourists to the aquarium in 1985, at around 35%. Both the trends of the proportion of tourists to aquarium and festival decreased constantly after 1985.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 11 view
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 11 view
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 11 view
2019-12-22 Sagar Gurung 73 view
2019-11-02 Trần Thị Như Quỳnh 84 view
Essays by user minhminhvu7 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84343434343 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75432246026 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479797979798 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.047618458 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.875 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124618124984 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641863279507 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497530430648 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905273565762 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050166008241 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.