The Chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart exhibits the outlay on diverse cargo used by consumers of two prevalent countries France and UK in the year 2010.
As a whole, provided data discloses the variation of expenses on consumer goods with regard to the pound sterling. Expenditure on cars, books and cameras was found to be higher in term of UK among which camera has sharp variation whereas computers and perfumes were used more in the case of France.
With reference to UK expenes on cars was around 450,000 which was the highest likewise, expenses on books was about 400,000 positioning it to be in the second, a step before expenditure of cameras which was around 350000. Comparing it to French, expenses on cars was around 400,000 whereas in books about 300,000 was spent which shows slight variation. Cameras, on the other hand, was used in much less in number as compared to UK.
In contrast, expenditure on computer and perfumes was higher in France. Around 370,000 was spent on computers by French which is over 20,000 higher than expenses by UK. Similarly, perfumes were found to have around 60,000 higher expenditure value than that of UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | kheth | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 61 | view |
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarke 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree and disagree. 56
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The chart below shows the number of passengers who used public transport in somewhere town from 2012 to 2015 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...as, on the other hand, was used in much less in number as compared to UK. In contrast, expend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, second, similarly, whereas, in contrast, with reference to, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86458333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4916309571 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510416666667 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7065966737 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 5.23603664747 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130645140515 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681583941303 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850638016912 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114432383023 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104688761322 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.