An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation?
Nowadays, a number of specialists is increasing. Doctors, educators and such identical scholars are migrating their own impoverished countries to matured countries due to get an acceptable job, higher salaries, access to advanced technology and more stable political, economic conditions. As a result, poorer countries will struggle to develop but this can tackle by offering more incentives to stay and better living conditions.
The major problem is decreasing professionals in poor countries which can lead negative impacts on these countries’ economy. A case in this point, Young, well-educated, healthy individuals are most likely to migrate, especially in pursuit of higher education and economic improvement. The distinction between ‘push’ and ‘pull’ factors has been recognized. Continuing disparities in working conditions between richer and poorer countries offer a greater ‘pull’ towards the more developed countries. Another issue of concern is lack of service professionals who are paid by government. For instance, higher education is one of the principal conduits of permanent emigration. The majority of doctors acquire specialized and postgraduate professional qualifications in the host country.
To counteract these problems, on possible solution would be for governments to ensure that a new educational model. Investing in the test scores and achievements is no longer a useful way to focus on education. A new educational model should combine traditional content with important financial, health and administrative skills. In addition to government action, improve the quality of teachers. No policy, no curriculum and money can achieve anything without capable and enthusiastic teachers. Teachers’ training needs to be improved and special emphasis needs to be given to effective teacher-student interaction, apart from subject knowledge. For instance, encourage people local communities to become teachers can impact to people who have an incentive to stay back in their home towns are encouraged to teach, government can solve the problem of lack of quality teachers.
To sum up, although financial problem a variety of problems and development due to migration of professionals, this problem is not insurmountable. In my view, it is the government responsibility to tackle that issue by offering a pleasurable working environment, they should begin by considering one of the proposed solutions above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | rjbangalore | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kaka singh | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Vrajesh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | asdfgzxcvb | 61 | view |
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 100
- Some people feel that teacher training courses can make anyone a teacher while others feel an excellent teacher cannot be made by pursuing a course.Discuss bot views and give your opinion. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9217877095 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49423812465 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617318435754 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4581722602 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.578947368 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21702559723 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551613193618 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522291855378 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129829422214 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404481151215 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.