The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
This bar graph compares five different methods of transport used by children in a country to travel back and forth to school in 1990 and 2010.
The most significant trend was in the number of travels made by cars. it has dramatically increased from 4 million trips in 1990 to around 11 million in 2010.
Regarding walking as a mean to reach the school, it had decreased about the half in 2010. Similarly, walking and bus methods had the same amount of change. Cycling, on the other hand, had a sharp decrease of about three and a half in 2010. While the usage of buses also decreased, but it was not as significant as the other methods going from 7 million travels in 1990 to around 5 millions in 2010.
Overall, there was a major change in the usage of different transportation methods to reach school in that country between 1990 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | HASAN.511 | view | |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 79 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. 73
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. 61
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for theirachievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... in the number of travels made by cars. it has dramatically increased from 4 milli...
^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'half' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'halves'.
Suggestion: halves
...d a sharp decrease of about three and a half in 2010. While the usage of buses also ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60130718954 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5259556534 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535947712418 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7581008796 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335776194884 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141840280495 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104161271295 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231336029906 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839527768363 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.