school
In modern time, many commentators are of the view that school ought to accept their students based on their potentials. Whereas others feel that students with mixed capacities ought to study in the same place. Although there are some arguments to accept the first former opinion, I still support the latter view because of more convincing reasons.
From an overall perspective, according to ability seems to be reasonable simply because this view could enhance study performance for high-level groups. In evidence, the teachers could give advanced lessons for good students without worry about weaker students. Thus, the good student would study faster, and achieve study success in their future easier.
In spite of the arguments above, I support the second opinion for the following reasons. The first argument is that there are more suitable group activities classes for the student with various abilities at school. To illustrate, nowadays, universities allow students to work in the group require different abilities. Therefore, it could help students have more opportunities to not only learn from others but also improve the group performance which important in the modern workplace. Equally important is that studying in low-level groups would affect negatively on student’s mental abilities. To instance, the students would lose confidence, if they are considered as less intelligent people than them. Consequence, without confidence, they would be faced with difficulties study as well as their future life.
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments of the first idea, it seems to me that there are more persuasive reasons to agree with the opposite second view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir students based on their potentials. Whereas others feel that students with mixed ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew because of more convincing reasons. From an overall perspective, according t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... study success in their future easier. In spite of the arguments above, I suppo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...hich important in the modern workplace. Equally important is that studying in low-level...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 822, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies study as well as their future life. In conclusion, although I recognize poss...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50191570881 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76751439911 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8363175805 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.571428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669312154121 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271724461379 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665710044996 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040235767163 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430594109771 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.