A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety. Therefore, some people think that the government should increase spending on defense but spend less on social benefits. To what extent do you agree?
It is argued that the state is responsible for the safety of its people, therefore the state should spend more in the security system as compared to social welfares. I completely agree, because of the rising tensions between different nations due to less supply of resources and murdering of people in the name of religion.
Scarcity of natural resources can create war-like situations between neighbouring countries, therefore it is essential for any nation to prepare for future clashes by improving their defence system. Natural resources are limited in quantity in this globe. Scientists of various nations are struggling to find an alternative to such issues or else to make minimum use. Failure in control of such things raises the tension in the region, which latter can create problems for the upcoming generations. For instance, drinking water is a precious natural resource and limited in quantity. Some countries are already dried up and they survive on filtration methods and some still have an abundant supply of water to feed many generations to come. This uneven distribution of water around the world can affect the relationships of neighbouring countries and results in a war-like situation. Thus, the government should spend money in order to improve its army.
Another factor is the rising tension by killing people in the name of religion. Every belief wants to show his dominance around the world and they believe their religion is greater than others. Competition to dominate sometimes emerge into war by killing the people of other religions. Therefore, the state should increase its budget to control such hate between people of a different religion. For instance, in news channels every day we listen to the killing of people in the name of religion, these criminally minded people must be controlled to make the world a safer place.
In conclusion, although the social aspects for mankind are important, the risk of war is increasing every day due to a limited supply of natural resources and hatred among people in the name of religion, thus it is necessary for the authority to spend more money in the defence budget to control such unwanted possibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-30 | Joel James | 91 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | Emjay | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | bhatvishal@ | 87 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | NAVNEET BALI | 81 | view |
- In some countries, children are expected to study more and more time both in and after school. Advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 61
- A restaurant has placed an advertisement for waiters and waitresses in your local newspaper.Write a letter to the restaurant, applying for the job. In your letter:•explain what you are currently doing•describe your suitability for this area of work• 78
- All education and healthcare should be funded by government and free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think a younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- You play a team sport with some friends. Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn't able to play with you at the weekend. You decide to write to him in hospital, telling him about the match.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13445378151 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74168884512 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2207195071 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154505306973 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537027977492 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660113397649 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100816197385 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280577086996 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.