Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there computer technology can replace their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since the invention of the Internet, human life has undergone drastic transformations in the way people work or study. Public libraries now are considered by some to be unnecessary due to the fast pace of technological development. In my opinion, I, however, totally disagree with this idea and believe libraries have their own distinct functions.
To begin with, information found in the Internet could not completely replace that contained in books from the libraries. In fact, huge number of writers are able to publish their works online nowadays without being carefully examined or thoroughly proved-read by a qualified party. It is also a common trend for news or articles from personal sites to spread at a surprising speed and go viral in a short period throughout the social media. The effects if this could be unpredictable as the readers receiving such information are most likely to be anonymous. One significance of the maintenance of public libraries include proving an ideal place where young students can seek for such authentic journals to conduct their researches or experiments at universities. This way, several untruthful and distorted contents taken from the Internet could be avoided, increasing the quality of students’ papers.
In addition, despite bringing unlimited advantages to users, computers or electronic and mobile devices do pose a huge threat on people, in terms of physical and mental health. When technology, mobile phones in particular, is used for reading purposes, it is undeniable that our eyes have to work all the way through their fullest potentials thus experience fatigue eventually when exposed within a prolonged period of time. To prevent this, health experts encourage everyone, regardless of age, to lessen the pressure on our eyes by reading physical books and library is an ideal place to indulge themselves in pages of academic knowledge. They have a chance to engage in a live discussion with their peers or even exchange ideas on a wide variety of subjects with the librarian.
In conclusion, libraries, especially those in close proximity with one’s neighborhood, play an indispensable role in comparison with computer technology. From my point of view, being a reliable source of information and health benefits are truth reasons in light of retaining the availability of public libraries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | thanhvan9893 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | Inpu Nguyen | 73 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there computer technology can replace their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watch TV. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet, and they can study just as well at home. To what extent do agree or disagree? 89
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- It is difficult for people in the cities to get enough physical exercise. What are the causes and solutions? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ntually when exposed within a prolonged period of time. To prevent this, health experts encour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...clusion, libraries, especially those in close proximity with one's neighborhood, play an i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37096774194 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04565028575 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631720430108 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.979424772 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138337643138 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433276787296 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041690233402 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855330620696 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053551508991 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.