Working in a group students learn more efficiently.
Generally / ,/ groupwork is a quiet common thing at colleges and universities. Personally, I am prone to believe that working on a project all together brings benefits. I hold this opinion since by doing so students better understand the assignment; they deeper comprehend the learning material; and they acquire useful skills while working in a team.
To begin with, working in a team guarantees that the task will be understood properly. This is due to the fact that students supplement each other, and their common understanding of the things that should be done is, of course, more precise. For example, when I try to fulfill any task at university, the first thing I do is calling to classmates and figuring out if I understand the task correctly. So, working in a team guarantees that the tasks will be performed properly.
Additionally, groupwork is probably the best form to learn something new inasmuch as it allows a person to explore viewpoints of other people on the issues and, consequently, to better comprehend the relevant facts and information. For instance, in my country's higher educational institutions it is adopted to assign projects or other collective task on issues which are difficult for students to comprehend. Thus, the more students are involved in the projects, the better the material will be learnt.
Finally, there are a lot of skills which students can master only by working in a team. These skills, such as debating, presenting material, and so on, are crucial parts of our education without which the process of the preparation for a career will be incomplete. My wife, for instance, is a PhD student at university and she goes to become a teacher. In this respect, she claims that one of the most important things in teaching methodology is to develop students' communicative and other features. In this regard, it is obvious that working in a group is an excellent opportunity for mastering necessary skills.
To sum up briefly, classwork that implies collective activities of students is crucial for their educational process. It definitely helps them learn information they should know more effectively and acquire necessary for their future career skills.
- TPO 33: CARVED STONE BALLSReading:Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types 81
- The reading and the lecture are both about the decrease of literature readers.The author of the reading believes that the reading public is reducing, especially among young people, which is an important loss for culture in general, and for the future of l 76
- Working in a group students learn more efficiently. 71
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Generally / ,/ groupwork is a quiet common thing a...
^^
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Generally / ,/ groupwork is a quiet common thing at c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, finally, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, of course, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13370473538 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98278916065 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548746518106 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3288278967 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242282316414 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764150316451 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050133442488 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130468074632 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183482310304 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.