has human damaged an earth?
Due to advancement of technology there is a drastic vicissitudes in human life. In a past, people live their lives with trivial things. Today they want to live a luxurious life. As far as, I am concerned, latest technologies have made worth effects on earth than earlier. Let me explain my point of view.
There are numerous reasons for me to discuss. First we talk about a Pollution. Due to developed factories, more carbon dioxide is thrown out from chimney of monsters. Ozan layer of environment is abridged. We can see effects of a global warming on earth. Temperature of an earth is being increasing. For an epitome, when I was a toddler, I played on bank of a river in my village. Water of river was a clean and I could take beautiful smell of flowers. Nowadays, that river has been polluted by local factories. Even I cannot pass through bank of a river due to an odour from water. I conceive that this is not good for our kids.
Second, we discuss about a Deforestation. Nowadays more and more forests are being cutting for woods. Forests are asking help in desperation. Killing of carnivorous animal leads to increase in number of herbivorous. Animals are hunted for furs and teeth. Deforestation leads calamities like a hurricance. Roots of trees hold soil but because of cutting of trees, soil is been washed. Trees absorb Co2 from an environment and curtail temperature of an earth. How healthy we are if our lungs are a trespassed.
Last but not least, we exploit natural resources from an earth. Natural means limited. However, we content with materialistic life but not comprehend value of natural sources which god has render us. For quintessence, in holidays, we go Himalayas, where we can enjoy beauty of forest and see wild animals like lions and tigers, which is their natural habitat. In south India, we can enjoy beauty of sea water. How we can enjoy beauty scene of sea if we throw plastics in it and sometime by accidently oil is been poured. Sharks and whales are being killing due to swalling of a plastic.
From above discussed all drawbacks, I can safely draw conclusion that people are enjoying prosperity without considering harmful effects of technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-20 | Niusha405 | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | rohitbibra | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | chaitali patel | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | chaitali patel | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | chaitali patel | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'vicissitude'?
Suggestion: vicissitude
...cement of technology there is a drastic vicissitudes in human life. In a past, people live t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
...uxurious life. As far as, I am concerned, latest technologies have made worth effects on...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'Pollution'.
Suggestion: Pollution
... for me to discuss. First we talk about a Pollution. Due to developed factories, more carbo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ozan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'layers', 'lays'.
Suggestion: layers; lays
...rown out from chimney of monsters. Ozan layer of environment is abridged. We can see ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'rendered'.
Suggestion: rendered
... value of natural sources which god has render us. For quintessence, in holidays, we g...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rest and see wild animals like lions and tigers, which is their natural habitat. ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idering harmful effects of technology.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80423280423 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.783375564 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568783068783 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.364060896 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 55.0303030303 100.406767564 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4545454545 20.6045352989 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.06060606061 5.45110844103 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151026000956 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374540823514 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785369980715 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732788807747 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466692653969 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.38 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.