The Chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The chart discloses the expenditure by French and British on five commodities used by a consumer of two prevalent countries France and the UK in the year 2010.
As a whole, in the provided time period, the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France. Combined expenditure of British and French on cars tends to be higher whilst the minimal amount of funds was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. It can be observed that the most significant difference in expenses amongst the two countries was on cameras.
With reference to the UK, expenditure on cars was around 450,000 which was the highest compared to France (at 400,000). Likewise, expenses on books were about 400,000 positioning it to be in the second, a step before expenditure on cameras which was around 350000. Comparing it to French, money spent on books was about 300,000 and expenses on cameras was less than half of the UK (150000) which shows vast variation.
In contrast, expenditure on remaining goods was greater in France. More than 350000 was spent by French on computers which accounts to be insignificant than the British who spent precisely 350000. Neither of the nations has higher expenditure on perfume with just 200000 expenses by French and under 150000 spent by the UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | kheth | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mattia95 | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and shows two possible sites for a new supermarket. 78
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarke 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, in contrast, with reference to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90366972477 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65157057793 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467889908257 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2042805082 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184718345183 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907794010089 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936517532341 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151925861332 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1145806241 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.