Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree?
Plastic has made a detrimental effect on the overall ecosystem of this world. Nevertheless, the usage of plastic bags has never deteriorated even after impacting negatively on the earth. It has been a debate among some people as to whether the plastic should be banned or not. This essay will discuss the phenomenon in detail and give my opinion at the end.
To begin with, plastic shopping bags contribute to water and land pollution at a macro level. As it is not recyclable the continuous usage of it will affect the earth in the coming future. If these are not banned, the earth will lose its biodiversity affecting the people and also the animals. Overgrowing population can make the matters worse and increase the pollution of land and soil. Furthermore, the marine ecosystem will be largely affected if the plastic is continued to be used.
Banning the plastic shopping bags will help in sustainable development, thereby keeping the biodiversity intact. Moreover, government should also take considerate steps to provide an alternative for the people which will eventually make the banning decision easier. People will also be able to live in a pollution free environment eradicating the unhygienic related diseases.
To put it in a nutshell, I strongly believe in this ideology of banning plastic shopping bags as there are various alternatives that can be manufactured and made available to the public at large. Also, it preserves the earth from the land and sea pollution resulting in better environment for the marine life and for the people in the future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | poojary.swetha92@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | Amir Nazaripoor | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-21 | niks54 | 67 | view |
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor 78
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the newson TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience. 67
- You are going on a month training programme to the UK and know that the head of the course would like one of the participants to be the social events' organiser.Write a letter to the Training Organiser. In your letter• expressing your interest in t 78
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... It has been a debate among some people as to whether the plastic should be banned or not. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... detail and give my opinion at the end. To begin with, plastic shopping bags con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er and land pollution at a macro level. As it is not recyclable the continuous usa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88489998596 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542307692308 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.376373976 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6428571429 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254286377109 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889064651009 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691529633538 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15552427453 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346043513689 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.