Public transport is the best way to get to work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Transportation plays an important role in maintaining discipline among office employees. It is argued by a significant number of individuals that state buses are the most appropriate option to reach office. While special routes of public transport make easier for a traveller to reach destinations, I am of the opinion that low quantity of buses decreases the frequency of the buses, results into difficulties for the commuter to reach office on time.
Direct routes to the industrial area from residential society make it convenient for most of the individuals to travel through public transport, therefore people prefer to use these buses to get to the office place. Public bus routes are designed accordingly so that buses can travel the shortest route to reach destinations and avoid traffic congestion. For instance, in Amritsar, India, the public buses of Amritsar roadways are allowed to take the separate lane to reach destinations and these lanes are meant only for public buses to avoid the traffic of other vehicles. Hence, it makes the fast movement of these vehicles and therefore it is considered the best way to reach office.
However, a limited quantity of public buses makes it difficult for the regular commuter to reach office on time, especially, during rush hours. A recent survey from New York City has revealed that only 25 per cent of city commuters use public transport to reach their workplace, because of the low frequency of the state buses thus, making it challenging for everyone to reach office timely. As a result, people prefer to use other alternatives such as taxi or personal vehicles to reach office.
In conclusion, although, to neglect long hour waiting in traffic signals state has introduced separate lane for the public buses to move faster, I believe the low quantity of buses is still a challenging task for the government to make public transport the best career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can the government do to reduce the amount of rubbish produced? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,•give details of your study plans•explain w 78
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the modern world. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace a teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The best way to reduce the number of traffic accidents is to make all young drivers complete a safe driving education course before being licensed to drive. To what extent do you agree? 56
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11464968153 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78214198212 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7567692079 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114312340593 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523200951322 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337653908802 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824145122192 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284949226324 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.