It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
As a byproduct of our cutting-edge life-style, it is commonly asserted that families are not as close as they used to be. This essay will investigate reasons as to why this change is occurring and provides solutions to reverse the transition.
The hectic and demanding day-to-day life, alongside digital gadgets with addictive attributes are among the highest contributors families drifting apart. While the former imposes time and geographical limitations, the latter can negatively influence quality and quantity of interpersonal socialization. As an instance, a recent study carried out by a collective of highly prestigious universities has indicated that the majority of first-world countries population have noticeably less free time to spend with families or friends and social relations are subject to grave deterioration due to cyber dependencies when compared with the last decade. All in all, even-though human beings are not anti-social by nature, the statistics illustrate a continuous trend toward this pattern of behavior.
Nevertheless, given that proper actions are taken and considering wise policies to be implemented into social paradigm, families could be mended. Seeking employment in more employee-oriented businesses, provided they are available, as well as restricting gadgets usage during certain family events and functions can potentially remedy the situation. While it would be naive to expect people not to compete professionally or abandon their digital devices altogether, it is undeniably a functional solution to the problem at hand.
To conclude, while out modern life-style accompanied by cyber addictions have had a central role in families growing apart, implementing remedy policies such as less competitive employment choices alongside imposing family regulations can efficiently boost interpersonal relations specially within families. Choosing a less demanding job as well putting away the digital distractions during family time are surely the best methods of promoting family relations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Surya Prakash | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | elham mousavi | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | Sinabri | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | ajmeet | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | sandip24 | 89 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you this the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Many people choose to learn practical subjects therefore theoretical subjects will no longer be taught in universities Do you agree or disagree 86
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree? Advantages or disadvantages? 77
- It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gadgets'' or 'gadget's'?
Suggestion: gadgets'; gadget's
...y are available, as well as restricting gadgets usage during certain family events and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89189189189 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26811968599 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652027027027 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.9971481211 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.545454545 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23933866227 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907819371288 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676368913386 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159414575378 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833730140407 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.