In some developing countries, it is difficult to get good teachers to work in rural areas which can have a negative impact on the education of children in those rural communities. Why do you think good teachers do not want to work in rural areas in developing countries? What could be done to solve this problem
There is no doubt that education is the basic right and necessity of every child in the world irrespective of their backgrounds. However, there is an alarming teacher shortage in most of rural areas in third world countries. My following essay will declare the reasons behind this situation and suggest some possible solutions to the problem.
At the outset, there is evidence that the disparities in all aspects between teachers in rural areas and those who are in urban zones are the most critical determinant leading to this issue. Initially, the low salary of teachers in these remote areas definitely deters them from choosing to work and devote to these zones. On the contrary, teachers in big cities are very likely to be a high-paid worker, which helps them to manage their life better. Apart from that, moving to remote communities can entail the poor living standard deprived of some crucial amendities and infrastructures including housing, hospitals, entertainment and isolation and remoteness or even cultural shock. It is extremely difficult for teachers to demote their lifestyles when they get used to it in big cities. Last but not least, the lack of incentives and motivation is also regarded as a momentous reason which hinders teachers from deciding to nourish, nurture the young generations in these areas.
Therefore, it is imperative for the government to address this problem to diminish inequality between different social classes. First and foremost, it is crucial that developed countries assist these third world countries with financial aid with the aim of enhancing living condition and also remuneration for their work. Furthermore, another efficacious way of tackling the problem is to recruit the local workforce or to train prospective workers in rural community. Entry to teacher training can be made more flexible to accept rural students who are highly stay in their job. Universities of education also should expand the opportunities on offer for students to experience working in remote areas as a part of their training, which makes them subsequently more probable to practice in these areas regardless of their backgrounds.
To recapitulate, children in remote community should receive the education they deserve and the government needs to take proactive measures to supply a healthy support to the future of the country.
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- With increasing populations and ever growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty. How can this be solved? 73
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries What are the causes of this What solutions can be offered 78
- The importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'staid', 'stayed'.
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...to accept rural students who are highly stay in their job. Universities of education...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, third, apart from, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31382978723 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86192828142 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571808510638 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.9330088074 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.2 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238313688431 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754726196763 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570922962638 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128025386885 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571801068704 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.