Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 2rem; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Lora, Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: normal;">Technology has made rapid progress in the past decade. It has changed the way people communicate with each other. It has made lives easier yet taken out the aspect of physical presence which was essential to communicate with another person in the past.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 2rem; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Lora, Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: normal;">Technology has opened up new avenues in the way we communicate with another person situated anywhere on the globe. It has enabled us to connect and share information with people irrespective of their location. This advancement in technology makes it easier for us to find and befriend like-minded people.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 2rem; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Lora, Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: normal;">Each new method that is developed also gives us the option to choose the level of intimacy and frequency of our communication with another person. In my opinion, this growth can make people feel socially active and more willing to engage in conversation with new people.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 2rem; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Lora, Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: normal;">On the other hand, technology takes away the physical aspect of communication. This limitation can make people feel an absence of the human touch and can take away from the clarity of a message. Communicating through messaging or phone can only go as far as getting the words across.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 2rem; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Lora, Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: normal;">We human beings are social animals and need to connect with other beings in their physical form in order to feel a deep connection. One always has the option to ignore social interactions online, but its harder to do that in real life. I feel that technology doesn’t allow for deep connections to be built because of the above limitations.</p><p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 2rem; color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Lora, Georgia, serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: normal;">To summarize, technology can be used to build newer connections at one’s own comfort and pace but its limitations don’t allow for deep lifelong relationships to blossom.</p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Kamala gunapu | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Kamala gunapu | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Lubna_b | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Lubna_b | 61 | view |
- the pictures show the improvement that has been done to the city from 2015 till present,describe the pictures and sum it into some paragraphs 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do u agree or disagree? 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent six consumer goods in four European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting information, main features and make comparison wherever relevants 11
- in many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places, do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 694, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... person situated anywhere on the globe. It has enabled us to connect and share inf...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i feel, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2260.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19178082192 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.30906388043 2.80592935109 154% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482191780822 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.580244388 49.4020404114 305% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 226.0 106.682146367 212% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 36.5 20.7667163134 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0659150206933 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493432516633 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428161151456 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659150206933 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.0 13.0946893788 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.02 50.2224549098 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.21 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.