Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, many people believe that it is crucial to give effective solution for increasing the amount of vehicles and pollution issues by rising the cost of petrol. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the foregoing view, but I also consider other methods which are able to solve those problems.
A hot potato is existing in daily life of society which are known as the overcrowding traffic and pollution problems should be dealt by increasing the cost of petrol. Firstly, the rise of petrol price helps limit the amount of people who are classified into the average cost of living class, especially for workers. Instead of trying to manage budget for gas price, they are more willing to choose public transportation system in order to cover all aspects of their lives. Secondly, the less amount of vehicles occurs, the less dark fuel releases. Besides, the increase in price of petrol causes the falling of turnover of traffic, so the air can be protected and much cleaner by this method.
However, there are many measures which are taken into account to solve these problems. The first solution is that the government should increase significant tax on private vehicles. By this way, it directly impacts on the decision of buying cars of consumers, so it can be seen as the long-term effect. Organising many events or campaigns to raise awareness of car problems is considered as the second solution. For example, in UK, there has some car-free days, people are not allowed to use private vehicles for transportation. In this day, citizens are able to educate about many car issues toward the society day by day, so it gradually brings huge impact on people's thinking.
In conclusion, the price of petrol should be increased for the purpose of protecting society and people also ought to be aware of their behaviours.
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries, especially in rich countries. 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? 93
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92532467532 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61109015282 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6161257521 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163262532999 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574769753705 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047418007211 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111617815117 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033880868518 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.