Is the Internet making traditional schools unnecessary in future?
Recently, the phenomenon of the influence of the Internet on education and diminishing the number of traditional schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is real and it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this idea can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of the tremendous change that internet has on declining the role of traditional educational places including schools, colleges and universities provides the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of modern education. From my own experience, when I was a university pupil, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these details. Firstly, internet provide the capability to develop distance learning which does not need to particular places. Furthermore, nowadays schools and colleges are well-equiped by modern technologies and facilities including videotapes, cameras, computers, laptops, printers and scanners which need the internet to work. These features have paramount impacts on the way of instructing and enhance the youths' abilities.
In addition, the idea of the internet's effects on decreasing the role of traditional schools has some merits as well. According to research undertaken by a prestigious university traditional schools must adapt themselves with modern technologies and features due to the changes in lifestyle and developments. Internet omit the limits which exist in traditional universities including the restricted areas to maintain the collections, journals and books and pupils have access to them by just one click.
In conclusion, while there are sevral reasons on the internet impacts on altering the traditional schools unnecessary, I profoundly believe that it has far more merits on better education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 85
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 11
- It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents, and others are not. However, it’s sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas are givin 85
- People succeed because of their hard work; luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 77
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'omits'.
Suggestion: omits
...in lifestyle and developments. Internet omit the limits which exist in traditional u...
^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'omits'.
Suggestion: omits
...in lifestyle and developments. Internet omit the limits which exist in traditional u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67576791809 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16331624639 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8815263065 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.583333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233620533712 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896433966372 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780294269455 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155450027191 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519018979496 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.