The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
it is not eccentric to argue that in the world, we live, assessing national greatness is a debatable issue among people. While some people think that reaching nation greatness by the use of its rulers or artist success is the best surest idea, others oppose this stance. In my view, I mostly agree with the idea that using peoples’ well-being is more accurate and rational idea to measure national greatness as compared with the use of leaders or artists achievements because of two reasons.
Assessing a nation in terms of greatness by the use of rulers’ or artists’ accomplishments is not valid and reliable. Are all artists or even rulers representatives of all people who live in the country or they are representative of parts of the society? In fact, in some country like developing, one's leaders are dictators, and they do not allow to people to elect them, so any prosperity of rulers in this country do not reflect peoples’ well-being. For example, Mohammad Ghazafi who was the leader of Libya could achieve the nuclear powers, and he also had lots of the adherents and wealth, yet the Libya people did not have access to their country wealth or facilities, as he controlled all the incomes which were originated from oil selling by himself, and ignoring peoples’ wishes and requests. Therefore, measuring peoples’ general well-being through the use of their rulers’ achievements is a fallacious issue. Moreover, the probability that artists or rulers make exaggeration on their achievements is higher than general peoples. To explain more, the rulers or artists could impacts on peoples by the use of their propaganda. For example, some TV program in the unites states like Fox News demonstrated every detail of presidents achievements.in repeated time to influence on people. Sometimes this type of mass-media is blamed due to receiving debauchery from leaders or artist to say their dictum to peoples.
Further, using general peoples’ well-being as the best indicator of national greatness is a logical issue. To clarify this point, building greatness among people have been achieved in long term periods, and rulers and artists success only have a transitory effect on nations greatness. On the other hand, when people experience welfare these traits remain and pass over their generations, and it could improve the national greatness for many years. For example, special leaders’ achievements could be deteriorated by the next leaders, yet peoples well-being is the status of a permanent and it remains during the time. Furthermore, there is some measurement that could estimates peoples well-being, but to assess rulers or artists success is an arduous issue. For instance, quantity and quality of life are the best indicators of peoples’ welfares. In contrast, any measure to evaluate leaders prosperity has been affected by their view. To be more precise, sometimes leaders are eager to attract more people to vote them for the next voting by the exaggerating on their success.
Although using peoples well-being is more valid indicators in contrast with the leaders or scientific achievements, they have some weakness. To explain more, everyone has own definition of well-being and to get nation greatness every researcher should conciliate plentiful data of different viewpoints, so this activity is frustrating, and costly issue.
In summary, while some people think that measuring nation greatness by the use of leaders achievements is a rational idea, I disagree with this claim due to its unreliability and invalidity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 83
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 73
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 66
- Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past 77
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is not eccentric to argue that in the w...
^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'best the surest'.
Suggestion: best the surest
... of its rulers or artist success is the best surest idea, others oppose this stance. In my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... fact, in some country like developing, ones leaders are dictators, and they do not ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...rs are dictators, and they do not allow to people to elect them, so any prosperity of rul...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1115, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'impact'
Suggestion: impact
...plain more, the rulers or artists could impacts on peoples by the use of their propagan...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...uccess only have a transitory effect on nations greatness. On the other hand, when peop...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'estimate'
Suggestion: estimate
...e, there is some measurement that could estimates peoples well-being, but to assess ruler...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in summary, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3031.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32688927944 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04990445013 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467486818981 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 945.0 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7197958734 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.782608696 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7391304348 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128871025986 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470707916827 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425151663176 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100931542227 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477117197866 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.