TOO MANY OLD HISTORIC BUILDINGS ARE IN DANGER AND DESTROYED IN MANY COUNTRIES. WHAT ARE THE MAIN REASON? HOW TO PROTECT THEM?
It is said that numerous ancient monument are at the verge of extinction, and even demolished in number of nations. Although there are various causes such as constructing new buildings by the government instead of protecting the old ones, different steps are taken like providing funds by officials to secure the historical buildings.
More complexes are made by an incumbent government as a replacement of heritage structures’ concern. Because of development of technology and modernization of society, people are leaning their interests to these shopping centers and cinema halls for their entertainment. This will, consequently, decrease interest of government in ancient buildings due to which these are at their destruction point. For instance, in Patiala, ruling officials spend their money in reconstructing an old cinema, Phul, instead of investing funds on renovation of Castle of Mirrors, a historical monument, which is closed from last ten years. Thus, this magnificent building is destroying due to lack of care and interests.
Nevertheless, government can take various appropriate measures to safeguard the famous immemorial buildings. Every year in country’s budget, allocation of funds should be done in such a way that an adequate amount is used on ancient structures, which includes these buildings proper care and repairing, and helps in protecting them from destruction. Moreover, many important facts of renowned historical monuments like The Golden Temple or The Red Fort are to be included in curriculum of students, which will bring curiosity in them to visit these buildings. Hence, Government makes efforts to maintain glory of these buildings, so that these can be in more danger.
In conclusion, with the advancement of time, various complexes are opening for public interests; however, government can protect antique buildings by providing sufficient funds, and including the knowledge of heritage structures in the pupils’ studies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-17 | lakhveer khokhar | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | prabhleenpreet kaur | 52 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT INTERNET HAS BROUGHT PEOPLE CLOSER TOGETHER WHILE OTHERS THINK THAT PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES ARE BECOME MORE ISOLATED. DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE OPINION. 84
- THERE SEEMS TO BE AN INCREASING NUMBER OF SERIOUS CRIMES COMMITTED EACH YEAR. WHILE SOME THINK THE BEST WAY IS TO USE THE DEATH PENALTY AS A DETERRENT, MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT OTHER MEASURES WILL BE NEEDED.DISCUSS BOTH SIDES. 67
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TAXING COMPANIES WHICH CAUSE IT IS THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION WHILE SOME SUGGEST THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER WAYS TO SOLVE THIS TROUBLE DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE OPINION 87
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, VERY FEW YOUNG PEOPLE READ NEWSPAPERS OR FOLLOW THE NEWS ON TV. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE CAUSES OF THIS? WHAT SOLUTIONS CAN YOU SUGGEST? 73
- Nowadays a lot of people are able to do their work from home Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this development 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Fort) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... like The Golden Temple or The Red Fort are to be included in curriculum of student...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68456375839 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19495514682 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7391965703 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.166666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138263727786 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463981013473 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418941131379 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792620969602 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023583625526 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.