International travel can make people prejudiced rather than broad minded. Why people fail to benefit when they travel? What we can do to improve their understanding of the countries they visit ?
Nowadays, tourism has been burgeoning day-by-day in other words we can say they can also be called as international travelers. But due to some circumstances they can make some folks prejudiced instead of broad minded. Owing to which mankind fail to benefit when they travel. The reason behind this scenario are listed below and the solution for that woe is also given in trail paragraphs.
At the outset, a person who has experienced about international travel could make people prejudiced else broad minded due to which they are unable to benefit when they travel. Firstly, they might not get enough facilities which they are expecting form the where they has visited and also due to lack of time they are not able to visit each and ever place they want to visit due to which they prejudiced and fail to get benefit. Secondly, international travelers have make some prejudiced and help them to become narrow minded ergo they are not able to get benefit as well as not every place they visit have a suitable climate at the time when they visit. Henceforth, they are not benefited when they travel.
On the other hand, there are some solution of this issue consequently they can understand the counties where they visit. The prime solution can be taken by local councils that they can make their traveler feel better and also by showing their culture. Moreover, they can spread awareness about their own nation in different country whilst the another way is that they can give them enough facilities so that they can be a person who has broad mind. Therefore, such kind of steps should be take by an individual and also by local authorities.
To recapitulate, there are myriad of reasons due to which human beings are fail to be benefited when they travel. To improve their understanding some steps are also taken by each citizen of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | vinitpatel | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-20 | Sherrysh | 84 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | phuongdiem249 | 78 | view |
| 2017-06-10 | MinhNgoc 299 | 89 | view |
| 2017-06-09 | lananh311a | 76 | view |
- Individual can do nothing to improve the enviroment; only goverment and large companies make differece.what extended do you agree or disagree? 56
- some people think that government should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with others via internet and no need of face to face contact Is it brings positive or negative development 39
- Some people think that there will be decrease in international travel in future. Do you think the less amount of international travel is a positive or negative development ? 73
- some people think that in the morden society individuals are becoming more dependent on each other. while other say that individuals are becoming more independent of each other. discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... they are expecting form the where they has visited and also due to lack of time th...
^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey are not benefited when they travel. On the other hand, there are some soluti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, kind of, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81191222571 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5112594202 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473354231975 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1226711186 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507719724776 0.244688304435 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204556912579 0.084324248473 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105868381038 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311225605991 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669121520297 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.