These days, people in some country are living in a "throw-away" society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away.
What are the causes and problems of this?
In contemporary society, many regions of the world are now witnessing an increase in a “throw-away” lifestyle. The following paper will take a closer look at the roots of this worrying trend as well as examining its influences on the environment and society.
The primary factors associated with this way of life are rapid innovation in technology and corporate greed. Prolific increases in technological developments result in state-of-the-art devices constantly replaced by superior models of them. This urges consumers to update their assets with optimal appliances available. In addition, corporate greed, as mentioned, is also to blame for the proliferation of this lifestyle. Since the ultimate goal of enterprises is to maximize their profit, their products are often integrated with planned obsolescence to make them break down shortly after guarantee expires. This forces consumers to purchase new products because replacing defective parts of a product is often more pricy than buying a new one.
The first victims that witness the consequences of this alarming phenomenon are the environment and society. As people are drawn towards novelty, they have a tendency to replace out-of-date products, some of which are disposed of directly to landfills. This exerts incredibly detrimental influences on the environment because it would often take modern appliances hundreds of years to decompose completely. Additionally, the prevalence of this lifestyle also has profound impacts on society. This destructive path of thinking would make people only want to buy new commodities instead of learning how to fix the breakdowns. In time, this would encourage extravagant buying behaviours among consumers.
Taking everything into consideration, the dissemination of the “throw-away” lifestyle has become every-increasingly perturbing due to rapid technological advancements and the greed of corporations. As a result, enduring decomposition process of thrown-away products will pose huge threats to the environment and frequent replacement of consumer products would stimulate unnecessary buying habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | Anoopben | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | nightfly1711 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Muhammed_10 | 61 | view |
- Wild animals are of no importance in the twenty-first century. Some people think that preventing these wild animals from dying out is a waste of resource.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generations companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- These days, people in some country are living in a "throw-away" society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away.What are the causes and problems of this? 84
- “I fear the day when technology will surpass human and we will have a generation of idiots”, said Einstein. Technology nowadays has developed an unimaginable speed while our communication skills have become worse.To what extent do you agree or disagre 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...world are now witnessing an increase in a 'throw-away' lifestyle. The f...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, well, in addition, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92233009709 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55302961406 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618122977346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9819168814 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144108032092 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442097722418 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259120534992 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837063980186 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206967595908 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.