Government should invest on teaching science subjects (maths, engineering, science, technology) rather than other subject (art, literature, history, language) for country develop and progress . To what extend do you agree or not agree.
Many people believe that the education system should receive (be given) more funding from the government to teach science at school. Personally, I agree that the government budget should be spent equally on teaching science and other areas to enhance the development of a country.
Improving scientific knowledge brings many benefits to the economic success of a nation. A focus of teaching science units such as mathematics and engineering could improve the technical skills of the local citizens. It would create more job opportunities as foreign investors prefer to establish their factories in a country where they could easily hire educated technicians. From the economic perspective, this tendency could reduce the unemployment rate and therefore, improve the living standard of a nation. Another benefit of teaching science units is that the educational system could create more researchers and inventors, who could make scientific breakthrough. In many cases, these creations such as the inventing of electricity or the vaccination researches could create many positive impacts on the overall welfare of a country.
On the other hand, the study of other areas could bring many advances to society. General knowledge of other fields such as history, demographics, and language could help local people connect more effectively with the global world. This would bolster trades, investing and idea exchange between nations. Moreover, teaching art and performance at school could produce many artists who would become an ambassador to a country. South Korean pop singers, for instance, are famous not only in their nation but also on a global scale and therefore, they could advertise and promote their culture foreign audience. The success of those artists brings more tourists to South Korea and makes a significant contribution to the local economy.
In conclusion, educating science and other subjects should receive equal funding from the government as all of the teaching areas bring economic progress to a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-07 | nguyenken91 | 73 | view |
- In many part of the world people do research in their family history Some people believe that finding out about previous generations is an useful thing to do Other however it is better to focus on present and future generations Discuss both views and give 82
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 79
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is this the case? Is it a positive development? 73
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. Causes and problems. 67
- The process of producing smoking fish 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ve equal funding from the government as all of the teaching areas bring economic progress ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s bring economic progress to a country.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47923322684 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80322627612 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536741214058 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0846103642 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157233542421 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574652878912 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651486280245 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130351659225 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724739129016 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.