Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In salad days of the millennium, society is polarized into two groups almost equally regarding the notion that contemporary technology has a role in making humans more social on the other hand rest go averse it. The following paragraphs will shed some light on both sides of the argument.
Firstly, modern technology has taken a vital role in everyone's life these days. And one of the greatest examples is the mobile phone, no one can imagine their life without it even a single day. Not just mobile phone the applications provided by new technologies are the key elements. There is a number of applications to make your life simple and easier. For instance, to commute if you want to book a taxi or cab for that you have an application, and to have a conversation with a friend or to know about their well-being you can use social applications like Facebook or Instagram. Secondly, despite of not knowing anyone personally still you can easily check on them using these social applications. Not just social application there are many entertainment applications, those can be used to keep your self engage and widen your networks. Finally, when you see someone in these social application and find their life interesting you have an ease of contacting them directly through the messenger application. Therefore, it is effortless nowadays to reach anyone added in your friend list without knowing that person personally.
In the contrary, if we talk about people becoming less sociable using the current technology that is also true. Although you are completely aware of what is going around the world, still you do not have time to talk to your own family members those are sitting next to you. Everyone using recent technology especially childer want to live in an imaginary world. They do not want to face reality. They avoid talking to the parents and grandparents. But wanted to make new friends on social applications. Which seems incorrect to me.
Taking all things into consideration I believe contemporary technologies have deteriorated our habits. And we have misunderstood the meaning of being social, social means to interact with the people around you and make cherishable memories with them in person. Overuse of these technologies is absolutely killing our sociability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 56
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience. 84
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what 78
- You were travelling via domestic flight to a place outside your home town. But when you reached your place of stay, you found that you forgot your travel bag in the airport. Write a letter to the airport authority regarding this and in your letter,Say why 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...re are many entertainment applications, those can be used to keep your self engage and wi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ake new friends on social applications. Which seems incorrect to me. Taking all th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09283819629 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89334846829 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575596816976 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9010542612 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4285714286 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1386251887 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431742799495 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390543192559 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951306413735 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224481468495 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.