In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words.
It is considered by many that developments in agriculture's sector are extremely relevant for our society. However, others support the opinion that these advances are not sufficient to distribute the food produced around the world. The purpose of this essay is to discuss this fundamental issue and to present technology for distribution, projects to saving food and legislation as three possibles solutions to adress this problem.
In fact, the technology and science developed in agriculture's field are improving more and more. On the one hand, these advances allow important grows in the production of food. For example, in Brazil, the use of new methods and techiques to enrich the soil make possible the increase for grain's plantations, such as soybean and coffee plantations.
On the other hand, these developments do not represent an eqqually and efficient distribution of food. For instance, countries such as the USA and the most countries in Europe have access to a variety of fresh and high quality vegetables and fruits provided by other countries, like Brazil. However, Brazil is a nation which suffers with hungry while people from rich countries could waste food. This fact is one of the contradictions of the current food production's model. Therefore, it is possible to see the massive difference between rich and poor countries.
Thus, a solution to avoid this sort of problem is the use of the research and science to delevop better forms to transport food. Moreover, public campaings could be implemented to avoid wasting in developed countries. And international laws should be discussed to support people who suffers of hungry around the world.
In conclusion, nowadays, advances made in agriculture are impressive, however, a considerable part of the world's population still go hungry. Thus, it is necessary to face this social problem, especially considering wasting and distribution of food between the continents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Iruki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | JiaYanLi | 73 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Wri 78
- Most people prefer ready to eat food rather than homemade food now.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that children s time outside should be filled with scheduled activities such as art and music classes and sports Others feel that children need free time to play and relax Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 36
- The bar graphs below show the Riverdale Public School s spending per student in a year as well as percentages of students who passed the reading and maths tests from 1990 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and m 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ve, however, a considerable part of the worlds population still go hungry. Thus, it is...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37254901961 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99706521979 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3040545256 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177388123307 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566162045304 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458033772427 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108451411247 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585281046974 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.