Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart compares the rate of consumers eating fruit and vegetable in daily meals in the year of 2002, 2006, and 2010.
Overall, in 2006, people who consumed fruit and vegetable were observed the highest rate during the surveyed period, while in 2002, there was among the least rate of consumed healthy food.
A glance at the bar chart given reveals that in 2002, the percentage of UK men who digested fruit and vegetable was 22%, which was 3% lower than that of women, at 25%. The bottom position belonged to children, at 11% in the same year. Similarly, in 2010, the rate of women eating fruit and vegetable hold the first rank at 26%, followed by men at 24%, and children accounted for 16%, considering as the third rank.
A striking feature was the percentage of fruit and vegetable consumers in 2006. Women showed more their interest in vegetable and fruit than the other groups, taking the lead at 32%. In contrast, men and children showed less favored in vegetable than women, constituting only at 26% and 18%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | yeu192 | 56 | view |
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 68
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2012 82
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 61
- The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. 84
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four differentseasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om position belonged to children, at 11% in the same year. Similarly, in 2010, th...
^^
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egetable consumers in 2006. Women showed more their interest in vegetable and fru...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75690607735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41205624377 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6145515053 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355839245322 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17083992262 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129061230543 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245372142538 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075930983224 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.