The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compare the shifts in annual expenditure by a certain UK school in different times, 1981, 1991 and 2001
Overall, it is obvious that although the proportion of UK school spending changed substantially in three years, teacher’s salaries still occupied the largest proportion and insurance just accounted for the smallest one.
Looking at the detail, in 1981, 40% of school’s budget was spent on teacher’ salaries, followed by 28% on payment for other workers. After a decade, the expenditure on teacher’s salaries rose considerably to reach a peak at 50% before decreasing gradually by 5% in 2001. In comparison, spending on other worker’s salaries witnessed a significant decline to only 15% at the end.
Initially, the percentage of money used for resources and furniture/equipment were equal, at 15%. After that the figure for resources rose slightly by 5% and then plummeting to 9% in 2001. But the opposite was true for Furniture/equipment, at 5% and 23% respectively. While the proportion of money paid for insurance climbed by 6% over the 30-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- Some ex-prisoners commit crimes after being released from the prison. What do you think is the cause? How can it be solved 84
- line chart 56
- the graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 67
- line 11
- Some people believe that schools should only teach children subjects which are beneficial to their future career and therefore others subjects such as music and sports are not important To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3908045977 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49485778188 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3072559074 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202970898884 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700853277933 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118095873186 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161034414726 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147869904777 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.