The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compare the shifts in annual expenditure by a certain UK school in different times, 1981, 1991 and 2001
Overall, it is obvious that although the proportion of UK school spending changed substantially in three years, teacher’s salaries still occupied the largest proportion and insurance just accounted for the smallest one.
Looking at the detail, in 1981, 40% of school’s budget was spent on teacher’ salaries, followed by 28% on payment for other workers. After a decade, the expenditure on teacher’s salaries rose considerably to reach a peak at 50% before decreasing gradually by 5% in 2001. In comparison, spending on other worker’s salaries witnessed a significant decline to only 15% at the end.
Initially, the percentage of money used for resources and furniture/equipment were equal, at 15%. After that the figure for resources rose slightly by 5% and then plummeting to 9% in 2001. But the opposite was true for Furniture/equipment, at 5% and 23% respectively. While the proportion of money paid for insurance climbed by 6% over the 30-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- many employees may work at home with modern technologies 84
- The environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To 89
- some people tend to take temporary jobs, for they have time to do other things. Do the advantage outweights disadvantage 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- line 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3908045977 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49485778188 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.3072559074 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202970898884 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700853277933 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118095873186 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161034414726 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147869904777 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.