Positive and negative effects of today’s communication
Recently, the importance of present day's communication and its corresponding impact has sparked an ongoing debate. Advancement in technology has made the connections strong among each other. Many believe that today's communication helped to meet the best in life, however, many holds its opposite view. In this essay I will discuss both the negative and positive effect with related examples.
From the social standpoint, communication has transformed from telegraph to web which has provided a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that global connections and information distribution are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that due to mobile and internet business has expanded to every corner of the world, video callings and text messages has eradicated the distances. Thus, beneficial ramification of advancement in connection can be seen.
Within the realm of science, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that communication medium such as mobile, internet, WiFi etc has made people less interactive. Mobile phones are distracting one to focus on their goals rather forcing one to engage in different activity. Moreover, fundamental aspects of this issue is that people are less socialize physically. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university asserted that excess use of mobile phone can lead one to depression, mental sickness and losses thinking power. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of increasing communication systems can be a threat for the society.
To conclude, there is several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of communication far outweighs its drawbacks. Not only this helping one to create strong interaction with each other but also allowing to learn everyday.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-03 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 88 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | amolsharma44 | 80 | view |
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 88
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples. 80
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one career. To what extent do you agree ? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
Recently, the importance of present days communication and its corresponding imp...
^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ong among each other. Many believe that todays communication helped to meet the best i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...ction with each other but also allowing to learn everyday.
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...h each other but also allowing to learn everyday.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50168350168 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10522786826 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9278544497 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165203183949 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474832593301 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636608606902 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937011745273 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821075131606 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.