As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The statement raises an issue that the thinking capacity of human beings will surely deteriorate as a result of over-relying on technology to solve our day to day problems. This statement is a bit too extreme as it undermines a lot of factors. At the very first, technology is not built on its own. We, humans, have been thinking critically and creatively to develop such technologies which in turn enhances our thinking capacity to an unimaginable degree. Technology is a result of persistent, diligent and creative efforts towards an achieving an efficient and smooth processing environment. This, as a matter of fact, directly rebukes the statement which illogically relates the deterioration of thinking capacity to the human mind. It is the out of the box thinking capacity of the human beings which helps us work harder, longer and efficiently.
Going back to the old days, people used to walk for hours and still cover a small distance and work for 10-12 hours and still producing a minuscule result. The invention of wheel has resulted in an eco friendly transportation facility which everyone avails in the current world and could reach our destination in relatively no time. The technologies of mobile phones, internet, cars and a lot more has not only helped us get more stuff done, but also makes us more productive and creative. Technology is never going to be fixed at a particular level, there is always scope for improvement, more efficient, eco-friendly, and salubrious solutions to the current problems. Though it has brought with it a lot of problems and complexities, this in turn has engaged a lot more human beings in trying to come up with an effective solution. Moreover, with the development of technology, employment rate has been on a rise since job opportunities have opened up for the college graduates. There is also a general sense of enthusiasm in the contemporary world to achieve a better living.
Today, no one would want to live an ordinary life. Everyone of us is working arduously and putting in persistent efforts learn and earn more. A rise in the number of students enrolling in a graduate course has been observed in the last decade or so. A competent environment will only make us, the humans, more creative and productive. The sense of competence which has prevailed in our world has made us more health concerned and has built our overall personality.
In a nutshell, the statement has raised an absurd issue which neglects a lot of factors and directly targets technology. Technology has helped us a build a better environment to live in with sky-touching sky scrappers and eventually made the world a more efficient and productive place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- "Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our students take these classes, they’ll all be able to get high-paying programming jobs and lead fulfil 55
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 54
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 33
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, thus, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98115562977 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502222222222 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2053723932 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274062313965 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070994414906 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687476104002 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145039446226 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557588749131 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.