Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year.
The discussion on fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their argument. The subject attract majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that now days many factors is increasing day by day which is more bad because factors with waste water and there are so many type of problems moving. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that 2010 in 50% people do waste water but now 90% water waste rather they are save the water. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this but one of the most alarming one is that in these many car, bike increased which is more bad rather they are should be save the rainwater with this not waste the water. Besides, 80% large water is most important for farmer because they are more need rainwater and we should not use bike or car. Hence, its apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of water is more important role play in human life without not possible life are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-05 | manpreet9999 | 65 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | harpreet hundal | 64 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | English time | 64 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | English time | 80 | view |
- a few individuals trust iths goverments responsibility to guarantee that is notionals have a healthy diet. 84
- The belching and unauthorized behavior unacceptable in modern offices. how far do you support give your response with justification. 77
- Discuss whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people life or work 77
- Some people thinks that it is better to educate schools, other, however believe that the boys and girls benefits more from attending mixed school. 55
- Advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented? 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...ctors with waste water and there are so many type of problems moving. Another pivotal asp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun car seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cars'.
Suggestion: many cars
... the most alarming one is that in these many car, bike increased which is more bad rathe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 247, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saved'?
Suggestion: saved
...h is more bad rather they are should be save the rainwater with this not waste the w...
^^^^
Line 13, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8880866426 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44376334856 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552346570397 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5069178464 50.4703680194 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198644113434 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078640391919 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162458676731 0.071462118173 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114820266937 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106405112779 0.0609392437508 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.