Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. While others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both the views and give your opinion
It is true that tons of plastic packaging is used annually all over the world because of its benefits. While many people argue that it is necessary for manufactures and supermarkets to diminish the amount of packaging of goods since it is a dominantly contributing factor of numerous plastic wastes; however, I would believe that customers should be responsible for reducing plastic packaging to protect our future.
On the one hand, in this area, manufactures and supermarkets are the biggest commercial companies wasting lots of plastic packaging. To use a common of this practice, according to Dantri Newspaper, there are more than 80 million plastic bags used daily without any consideration by companies in Amata industrial zone. Moreover, plastic bags could get stuck in soil or land, which prevents rainy water flow, causing flood. Flooding has taken place extensively in the northern half of Vietnam’s narrow central part, demolishing inhabitants’ accommodations, villages and farms. Such a natural disaster may be long-lasting unless people stop using plastic bags. Additionally, people often believe that simple and reused packaging not only could enhance company’s reputation, but also attract those who pay high attention to environmental problems.
On the other hand, some people assume that individuals also have responsibility for reducing plastic waste by avoiding buying goods with lots of packaging. The main reason is that protecting environment is the principal mission to all citizens worldwide. More and more people living in urban areas take tote bags, which are made from recycled materials, along with them whenever they buy something from shops or supermarkets. As a result, a huge number of plastic bags decrease monthly, helping people save their money and protecting environment as well. Personally, I definitely agree with the concentration on individuals’ responsibility for saving our environment, but I feel that it may be necessary for companies and manufactures to cut down packaging of goods to prevent many kinds of pollution.
In conclusion, while many people might vary in their opinions, I believe that people globally should consider protecting environment as one of their primary aims by reducing plastic bags and using recycled objects such as metal straws, fabric cup holder or reused tote bags.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- The assessments of the student’s learning outcomes are the main way to collect their progress in educational courses. It is said that students’ ability should be assessed basing on their performance on a test at the end of course. To what extend, do y 78
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history. Others, agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantage of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication. Do the benefits of globalization outweigh the drawbacks? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... attention to environmental problems. On the other hand, some people assume th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, well, while, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55922865014 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13635607481 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589531680441 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.3886458674 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.142857143 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241331161353 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793268773776 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101671749503 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147918137325 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762137874636 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.