People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
The statement asserts that people should only undertake risky action after they have carefully considered its consequences. This statement makes a logical sense and therefore, I firmly agree with it.
To begin with, premeditation of the consequences of a risky action can assist people to evaluate the feasibility and validity of their behaviors. Therefore, giving people an opportunity to create a favorable outcome. In certain fields, even a single failure disastrous. For example, it is necessary for stock investors to utilize their money wisely to maximum profit while a reckless decision may lead bankruptcy. Such activity requires people to consider different factors from multiple aspects. For example, the trading trend around the globe, in other word, what commodities people are interested in now. Moreover, trading policies among different countries may change. Such as Middle Eastern countries that mainly export gasoline, may limit annual export quantity and allowed certain companies to purchase their products. If investors cannot take these issues into consideration and reckless invest their money in it, they would have hard time adjusting their plans to the reality and therefore, leading themselves to a miserable ending.
Secondly, people may be overwhelmed by a current sensation and want to participate in certain activities in order to gain some benefits. Simply put, why not do what other people are doing right now? Therefore, without the presence of considering thoroughly, people easily blindly follow the trend and some are lucky enough to obtain the profit they want; while others may lose terribly. Tulpenmanie is the most compelling example in point. This investment happened during the Dutch Golden Age in sixteenth century when the Dutch introduced tuple’s bulbs from Turkey to Europe. The tuple they brought back to Europe was so sensational that literally everyone was crazy for it. From nobility, military generals to normal civilians. However, such sensation inevitably attracted some opportunists who spared no efforts to manipulate the markets. They raised the price of a bulb by promulgating its beauty, value and promoting tuples as a symbol of social status. Therefore, the price became outrageous and people could not afford a single plant yet still desire to get one. So, a specific trading pattern appeared: the futures contract. Overnight, everyone was capable of having tuples that they could not afford. However, things was exacerbated. Even with the introduction of the futures contract, people still could not pay any money. Finally, the Dutch market collapsed and every investment disappeared in a snap like bubbles. Tons of people lost a great amount of money as well as other things in exchange for tuples. Consequently, if people back to that time had considered what was about to come carefully. The financial tragedy may be avoided.
Admittedly, some may argue that there are circumstances which cannot allow people to take their time to think before taking action. For example, when a building is on fire, it leaves too little time for firefighters to consider a well-structured rescuing plan. They need to take action immediately to save people’s lives. However, that is not always the case.
Finally, I firmly agree with the statement that people should undertake risky action only when they have carefully considered its consequences.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-24 | Shams Tarek | 66 | view |
2019-10-22 | shahryar2222 | 66 | view |
2019-10-01 | mussob34 | 16 | view |
2019-09-26 | kimmj0501 | 50 | view |
2019-09-26 | helxing | 54 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little imp 55
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students ison the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating byadopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academicendea 49
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 76
- Movies are popular all over the world. Explain why movies are so popular. Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2899.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45951035782 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81919708844 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9365932284 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2647058824 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6176470588 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44117647059 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370621791383 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855934355391 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177594609856 0.0758088955206 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328957544367 0.150359130593 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.245957489114 0.0667264976115 369% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.