Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In recent decades, the question whether government should invest the national budget in campaigns of wild animal preservation or spend money on human being’s development has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although there are many benefits when spending money on the wildlife conserve, it is more significant to spend on human population.
There are many reasons why most people think that money spent on population is important. First, this amount can be used to improve the quality of life, and expand the life expectancy of human. In fact, we are facing with the increasing disease widespread, such as dengue fever in tropical areas, therefore it is vital to invest more money to research and prevent these kinds of diseases. Second, education is also the top priority in any society. This means a nation is difficult to flourish economy if their residents lack trainings from schools, such as vocal training centers or universities in which people can gain knowledge and practical skills to become valuable labor force for society.
On the other hand, we cannot deny the importance of wild animals in existence of human. First, wild animals are on the verge of extinction, it is also has a huge impact on human beings. For example, climate change is becoming an alarming problem, it not only puts wild animals in jeopardy but also has negative effects to human existence. Second, animal hunting is rampant, this is attributed to the balance of ecology.
In conclusion, the expenditure on protecting diversity of wild world is not necessary. By considering all pros and cons carefully, the government will have some feasible solutions to tackle the situations, making the earth a worth-living place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Vijitha00 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | taho.ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | myra124 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Tieulinh | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | Amrit H Kaur | 89 | view |
- The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world 81
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. 84
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 47
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
In recent decades, the question whether government should invest the national b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificant to spend on human population. There are many reasons why most people t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome valuable labor force for society. On the other hand, we cannot deny the im...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18861209964 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78445134382 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629893238434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7468460165 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243944584866 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752629719439 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04820789178 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117206984538 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456382630051 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.