Arrangements in universities such as how many hours that the libraries should be open or what kind of food should be served in the cafeteria affect students' academic lives as well as their living standards on campus. Some people argue that students should not be involoved in making such decisions and experts ought to be hired to do the job exclusively. Nevertheless, from my perspective, universities should take opinions from students seriously and allow them to participate in the decision-making process.
On the one hand, contributing to the policy on the campus, students will be more statisfied for their school lives and their devotion toward their universities will grow in the mean time. As students own the right to adjust the arranments, their specific needs are more likely to be met. For instance, when the finnals are approching, the deminds for extra opening time for library will rise siginificantly. Students could ask the library to open during the night time or extend the opening hours at the end of each terms if they could participate in the decision of library policy. As a result, they are able to study in a better environment compared to cafe or other avolible places, and thus more apprciate for their univiersites.
On the other hand, the services provided by schools will be more efficient if students could access to the decision-making process. As the policy is designed based on their needs, students are more likely to take advantage of services instead of wasting them. For example, if the food sold in cafeteria are popular among students, the reveneus will be high and less food will be throw amay because of spoiling. Only when the policy makers take the vioce of students seriously could they success in making decisions.
Admittedly, asking students to make decison tend to cost a considerable amount of time of both students and univeristies since opinions need to be collected and investagions are requied to be made. However, the pay off for such conducts will bypass the costs of doing them as it is harder to withdraw a policy once the money and time are invested into that project.
In summary, it is wise to allow students to play a role in the decisons about issues that affact daily life of everone on campus because firstly, students will live a smoother life as their needs are satisfied, and secondly, the policy will be more efficient if students' opinion are taken into consideration. Finanlly, the benefits of allowing students to participate are well above the costs of it.
- It’s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside of the school. 73
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 90
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public. Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them. Which do you prefer? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96713615023 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79498516543 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485915492958 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0575102651 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 5.45110844103 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343845920675 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114176743876 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10531775278 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195911866488 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131324388665 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.