Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and giv

Essay topics:

Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is thought by some that leading an easier life can solve the environmental issues which are caused by fast developments in technology, while, in my opinion, high technology is the most significant way to address the root cause of environmental emergencies.

On the one hand, living a simpler life can reduce pollution in some way. Firstly, a simpler life always means less consumption, which can dramatically reduce the unnecessary waste produced in the consumer culture nowadays. People who lead an easier life prefer to buy things they really need instead of impulsive shopping which is more likely to buy a lot of unnecessary things ending up in landfill, becoming a burden to the ecosystem. Secondly, people living a simpler life always try to recycle and make the full use of things, such as water, plastic bottles, and clothes. For example, sending unuseful things to the waste bank is a good way to recycle.

On the other hand, I believe technology is a good way to handle the environmental crisis. Instead of using traditional fuels, such as coal, oil, and gas, renewable energy is an ideal resource which causes much less air pollution. For instance, over the last decades, sustainable energy including solar energy, wind energy, and nuclear energy has replaced coal becoming the dominant energy resources in European countries, making up more than 50% of its total energy production reducing the carbon emission by over 60%. Furthermore, the electrical car, which produces none fume, is much friendlier to the environment and will contribute a lot to the zero-carbon target.

In conclusion, an easier life can make a difference to resolve the environmental problems by producing less waste. I believe, however, the using of technology can be the most effective way to resolve the crisis.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 trunghn1 56 view
2019-09-25 Lynn Li 78 view
2019-09-19 linh.king 80 view
2019-06-21 MrDucPhD 89 view
2019-06-02 khoathanh97 78 view
Essays by user Lynn Li :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16610169492 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89555028164 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1203314122 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9166666667 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161937328786 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684794145189 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703307714547 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104375989365 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430898746012 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.